Having a Rare 3 Percent of Cancers, Graham Baldwin Needs Your Help

Graham, with Stage 4 head and neck cancer, is still working as best he can despite the pain. Graham, his family and friends have launched a gofundme site to help him meet his extraordinary healthcare expenses. Please help.

 

For the average 12-year-old Little Leaguer, hitting a home run is fairly unusual.

But this strapping kid stepped up to the plate and hit the ball so hard to straight away center field nearly 200 feet away, the little sphere didn’t go over the fence, but mocked the fence. The ball broke clean through the wooden planks and dribbled beyond the field to be recovered by a coach later.

Babe Ruth would have been proud of the kid.

The kid is no longer a kid but still “swinging for the fences.”

Graham Baldwin, 49, is a hardworking environmental building and development inspector in Maryland and father of an 18-year-old girl, who is a college student. He’s a widower who lost his wife to breast cancer in 2005 and mother-in-law who also had cancer and died a month before her daughter. Graham’s daughter was 6 when his wife died.

Graham has always loved nature and has even owned a fishing store for a while. To pay his wife’s medical bills, he juggled two jobs for years, and occasionally a third. Those bills included the cost of medicines, medical equipment, extensive surgeries and nursing care.

He’s an amazing guy. He tries to unravel the nuts and bolts of healthcare by himself to get through the maze of bills and insurance, and what procedures to get next. He needs care and support, and money too.

A Serious Diagnosis

In 2006, soon after his wife’s death, Graham was diagnosed with benign tumors in his head and throat. For the next several years, he was treated by an ENT and underwent 5 surgeries to remove tumors. Around 2011, he noticed a lump in his neck. The lymph node lump kept growing, but the ENT reassured him it was not cancer, a conclusion supported by several negative biopsies.

Graham insisted on removing the lymph node and the day after surgery, the doctor told him it was, in fact, cancerous.

Cancers that are known collectively as head and neck cancers usually begin in the squamous cells that line the moist, mucosal surfaces inside the head and neck (for example, inside the mouth, the nose, and the throat), according to the National Cancer Institute.

Head and neck cancers account for about only 3 percent of all cancers in the U.S. These cancers are nearly twice as common among men as they are among women.

Graham’s cancer began in a tonsil, and he underwent a double tonsillectomy and was aggressively treated, no doubt because cancer hit the lymphatic system.

He received almost daily doses of radiation for approximately 30 treatments and concurrent weekly chemotherapy treatments. Due to the many high doses of radiation, his salivary glands and teeth were killed, with resulting dangerous abscesses and infections.

“The pain in my mouth makes it very hard to eat,” he says. “The lack of saliva also allows infections to occur in your mouth, which is very painful. I need all of my teeth surgically removed.”

There’s one word to define the pain: extreme. And so when he’s hungry, he really has a tough time eating or drinking. There are times when Graham can barely talk; it’s just that difficult to move his mouth because of radiation damage and the procedures doctors perform to support the jaw while they work on it.

Looking for Answers

For a long time, he used to fish commercially in the Patuxent River when he owned a fish and crab store. He can’t keep the part-time job anymore, or fish, and he’s still working as best as he can, despite the pain. “It is physically impossible” to maintain both jobs, he says.

Oh, I didn’t mention Graham also had an accident two years ago that shattered his left arm, which may not have happened if it wasn’t for the chemotherapy. Unfortunately, he fell a second time, again shattering the arm and necessitating another long surgery.

As he says it, every cent he earns goes to medical care, co-pays, surgeries, prescriptions, the ones that insurance doesn’t cover. And there are the many trips he must make to the hospital and the physician offices, not exactly the kind of traveling he enjoys. Now he’s fishing for answers.

Complications in Health, in the System

Unfortunately for Graham, the American healthcare system doesn’t always help the sick, even those with health insurance.

Graham and others experience many delays and uncertainties: some of those unfortunate experiences are wrapped around perceived or actual lack of care as symptoms of illness aren’t pursued; precautions which are not taken by hospital personnel before treatments; or required physician forms not filled out in a timely manner with the doctor’s signature.

You want more? Ok. Then there are disputes between doctors and insurance companies over what procedures would or should not be covered, or whether brand name or generic drugs should be used. Graham has reached out to many people, from politicians to bureaucrats, and sometimes he gets answers, mostly not.

At the center of these silent storms in hospital rooms and physician offices throughout the country, is the patient, like Graham, who bears the consequences.

Graham’s life is on the line. Because of treatment delays that have resulted in a morass of financial difficulties, his doctors now tell him he must move forward promptly to remove his remaining broken teeth and repair his jaw before the

Increasingly resistant infections prevail. The surgeries, Graham’s doctors say, are imperative to save his life, but the lack of coverage forces him to postpone treatments. The infections aren’t pausing for billing arrangements to be resolved or insurance coverage extended. They keep coming.

Please help Graham

Graham and his family have many friends, who are trying to raise money for his care. Graham established a gofundme page, which friends have supported.

Graham writes about seeking monetary help: “I was always a proud person, and now am overwhelmed and exhausted.  If you are able to help in any way, I am ever so grateful.”

He has defied the odds so far.  A friend writes how “his doctors are amazed at his courage, fortitude, and perseverance.”  But now he needs your help and support to keep pushing through.

Please give this extraordinary man the chance to keep fighting.

Graham has hit home runs his whole life. It’s time for another.

 

 

 

 

 

CDC Works To Untangle Mystery of Zika and Guillain-Barré Connection

Of all the stories about Zika, one of the great mysteries involves its link to the Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Can it involve lightning strikes? Or even past surgeries?

Maybe nothing so outlandish, or could it? Such is the uncertainty surrounding Guillain-Barré (GBS) and Zika.

In the U.S. there has been one case of GBS reported for someone who traveled in an area with Zika, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. Snce 2013, at least 12 countries in Central and South America have reported increases in GBS following the “first introduction” of Zika into those countries.

The Zika virus is transmitted primarily by the Aedes mosquito, and can be spread by sexual contact. The virus infection during pregnancy can cause serious birth defects and is linked with other adverse pregnancy outcomes. On Friday, the Food and Drug Administration Food and Drug Administration recommended “universal testing” of donated blood as another effort to shield the nation from Zika exposure.

So what’s the connection, no manner how tiny, between Zika and GBS?

The CDC is looking closely.

“The CDC is continuing to investigate the link between GBS and Zika to learn more,” says Dr. Jim Sejvar, a neuroepidemiologist at CDC, who has been leading its Zika-related GBS work. “We began conducting enhanced GBS surveillance in Puerto Rico in advance of the island’s Zika outbreak. We are gaining more information about the development and progression of GBS as the Zika outbreak progresses.”

GBS occurs in only a small number of people with recent Zika virus infection, he says. All countries which recently reported increasing numbers of GBS cases have the mosquito species capable of spreading Zika, Sejvar says, noting they have climates conducive to mosquito survival year-round. Generally, cases of GBS occur for no known reason, and true “clusters” of cases of GBS are very unusual.

GBS is an uncommon sickness of the nervous system in which a person’s own immune system damages the nerve cells, causing muscle weakness, and sometimes paralysis. Rates of GBS in the United States and around the world are fairly stable, Sejvar says. That amounts to an estimated 3,000 to 6,000 cases, or 1-2 cases for every 100,000 people, develop GBS each year in the U.S. Most cases of GBS occur for no known reason, and true “clusters” of cases of GBS are very unusual.

Early treatment of GBS with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) or plasma exchange/plasmapheresis halts the progression of GBS. When treated quickly, patients are less likely to have severe disease or death.

CDC Explores the Connections

There’s a lot of uncertainty involving Zika and GBS.

In 2013, health officials in French Polynesia reported a “concerning increase” in GBS cases that coincided with a large outbreak of Zika, which was the largest outbreak of the virus to that point, Sejvar says. Most people with GBS report an infection before they have GBS symptoms.

Generally, researchers do not fully understand what causes GBS, other than “it’s the body’s response to stimuli,” he says.

“As the (Zika) outbreak continues, we are learning more and we hope to be able to better understand the relationship between the two conditions,” Sejvar says. “We are gaining more information about the development and progression of GBS as the Zika outbreak progresses.”

“Like with other illnesses that may lead to GBS, it’s not known how infection with Zika may trigger GBS,” he adds.

There are some interesting, and sometimes intriguing clues, but they have all to be explored.

For one thing, older people may be at a greater risk of developing GBS, and “that also appears to be the case with Zika,” Sejvar says. “We are working to learn more about what other factors may play a role.”

Oddly, a “number of other non-infectious stimuli such as surgery or a lightning strike have been associated with GBS,” he adds. On rare occasions, vaccinations have been associated with the onset of GBS.

With the transmission of Zika in two small areas of the Miami, Fla. Area, the CDC is working with officials from the state’s Department of Health to identify Zika and any GBS cases, ostensibly to develop or find any links. In addition, the CDC began conducting “enhanced GBS surveillance” in Puerto Rico in advance of the island’s Zika outbreak, according to Sejvar.

He has a warning for doctors:

“Clinicians in the United States should be aware of the potential for GBS cases in travelers returning from areas with Zika, and of the potential for Zika spreading to other areas of the United States,” Sejvar says.

 

Fentanyl: The “Counterfeit” Deadly Drug 50 Times More Potent Than Heroin

It’s one thing how dangerous too many legitimate prescription pills for people may be.

It’s another how deadly counterfeit prescription pills may be, such as those containing fentanyl, an opioid painkiller that is 50 times more potent than even heroin. It has so much, unfortunately, that is packed in so little:

The Drug Enforcement Administration says that a powerful dosage of fentanyl can be counted as a microgram. Let’s put it this way: just a few granules of table salt.

Fentanyl represents the latest drug-related crisis. The DEA says that many fentanyl pills are being sold “underground” as oxycodone or other opioids, often unknown to the buyers. Fentanyl also is mixed into or sold as heroin, again, without the purchasers having a clue.

Illicit traffickers are cashing in by counting on the “high demand for authentic prescription drugs as an incentive to produce the counterfeit drugs, and thus increase their revenue,” the DEA says.

In the words of the DEA, “hundreds of thousands of counterfeit prescription pills have been introduced into the market.”

“The DEA is facing an unprecedented threat in battling fentanyl and fentanyl-related compounds, many of which are more deadly or lethal than heroin,” the agency says in statements to HealthDataBuzz and in recent reports, including the DEA’s intelligence brief released last month, “Counterfeit Prescription Pills Containing Fentanyls: A Global Threat.”

Between late 2013 and late 2014 alone, there were more than 700 deaths related to fentanyl in this country. But that may not be the whole story, says the DEA, noting that some of those deaths – which may be linked to fentanyl – may be attributed solely to heroin. As the DEA puts it: “Those figures may be under-estimated.”

Since 2014, law enforcement agencies have been seizing the counterfeit pills, which in many ways resemble “the authentic medications they were designed to mimic,” the DEA says. Fentanyl is hard to detect, and can only be done through a laboratory analysis, the agency adds.

Prince’s Death

Was the singer Prince, who died April 21 following an accidental overdose of fentanyl, a victim of what was up the road essentially a counterfeit scheme?

Pills seized inside the singer’s Paisley Park compound were labeled as hydrocodone but actually contained fentanyl, which was responsible for Prince’s death, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported, according to its source. Investigators are “theorizing” that Prince did not know the pills contained fentanyl, according to the news account.

Even more counterfeit drugs

There have been several incidents earlier this year in which the DEA made arrests related to counterfeit prescription pills.

Earlier this year, DEA officials said they arrested an alleged counterfeit prescription pill producer in New Jersey and the agency also issued a search warrant in Los Angeles targeting similar operations involving fentanyl and other synthetic opiates.

In the New Jersey case, the pill producer was charged with allegedly producing 6,000 pills, the DEA said. And, indeed, the pills were made to “resemble” 30-milligram Oxycodone pills, but lab results showed they contained either fentanyl citrate or acetyl fentanyl.

The DEA noted deaths in other cases this year in Florida and California from counterfeit Xanax and counterfeit Norco pills containing fentanyl.

Although Norco is an opioid like fentanyl, Xanax  is a benzodiazepine. “This demonstrates,” the DEA said, “that though traffickers are interested in expanding the fentanyl market to the other counterfeit opioid medications, they are also willing to utilize fentanyl in other non-opiate drugs with exploitable user populations.”

For law enforcement and emergency responders, fentanyl also could have significant adverse consequences. Just touching fentanyl or accidentally inhaling the substance can result in sudden absorption through skin, the DEA said.

As a result, officials could face “disorientation, coughing, sedation respiratory distress or cardiac arrest,” the agency said in an alert. Such an impact could be “very rapid and profound,” the agency says, “usually occurring within minutes of exposure.”

That can be said, too, about the widespread illicit trafficking and use of fentanyl: rapid and profound.

A Vision of Hope For Diabetic Retinopathy Patients

“Our mission is to eliminate preventable blindness,” says Dr. Sunil Gupta, founder and CMO of IRIS (Intelligent Retinal Screening Systems) of Pensacola, Fla.

Imagine making a decision to go to an eye doctor’s office that can mean the difference between having a satisfying life, or one fraught with loss of vision. That’s the potentially dramatic situation of patients with diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of blindness in working-age adults.

For many of these patients, they wait too long to get their eyes checked by a specialist, and by then their vision has been severely disrupted or gone entirely. They may need significant surgery and expensive medications to maintain their eyesight. Even with intervention, therapies don’t always work.

Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of vision loss among people with diabetes. It involves changes to retinal blood vessels that can cause them to bleed or leak fluid, severely distorting vision.

Dr. Sunil Gupta, a physician and an engineer, says that 60% of diabetic retinopathy patients often avoid going to an eye doctor. This negligence can cause devastating consequences for the patients and their families, and impact on healthcare expenses.

Because diabetic retinopathy shows no symptoms is until the disease is in advanced stages, experts say that people with diabetes need a diabetic eye exam at least once a year. That hasn’t been happening as much as it should be, says Gupta, founder and chief medical officer of IRIS.

“When patients do show up for an eye exam, they have been losing vision, and now it’s a problem, and there is damage to the tissue,” he says. “At this stage, it’s an uphill battle. The patient can’t drive. The patient can’t watch TV. The patient can’t focus. And glasses can’t fix the problem. The key is to get to these people for an examination before that happens. If a doctor had gotten to (examine) the patient sometimes years earlier, this would have been all preventable.”

In practice, it is each primary care physician’s (PCP) responsibility for getting patients to this eye exam. However, the PCPs rely on ophthalmologists for these services. Physicians were left to trust that their patients would follow through in seeing an eye doctor, but less than 40% actually would. The idea of a telemedicine solution is to “remove the silos,” Gupta says. By having a team approach, Gupta says primary care and eye specialists can make it easier for patients to be compliant with their necessary care plans.

Gupta is working to drastically improve eye care. “We decided, ‘why not automate the process for the primary care doc’’ he recalls, “and bring the exam to the patient?” He and his IRIS team have developed an FDA-cleared Class II telemedicine platform that securely sends images from primary care to ophthalmology through a cloud-based Grading Platform. The retina specialists are then able to diagnose the image with pathology, and a final, graded report is returned to the PCP to include in the patient’s electronic medical record.

A Success

So far, IRIS is a success, Gupta says. Through partnerships with independent physicians, insurers and others, at least 110,000 otherwise unexamined patients have gotten this necessary exam. Ophthalmologists and retina specialists have diagnosed over 40,000 instances of diabetic retinopathy. Gupta says.

About 15,000 patients have been referred for moderate to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. “We think those patients would have gone blind if we had not picked up the disease,” he says. “It [the diagnosis] is a ‘shot across the bow’ for these patients and prompts them to manage their disease better.”

Keeping with the theme of making it easy and automated for primary care practices, Gupta’s team has developed bidirectional integrations with multiple EHRs (electronic health records) – including Epic. When the ophthalmologist signs the patient report, the data is integrated directly back into the EHR. Gupta notes that overall, IRIS’s integration with EHR systems has led to significantly more patient usage and more physician engagement.

In 2013, the Harris Health System in Houston, Texas, partnered with IRIS to improve their evaluation of diabetic patients. “It’s important all patients are evaluated, especially inner-city populations of African-Americans, Latino and Southeast Asia population, all of whom have a high-rate of diabetes,” Gupta says. Harris Health, considered a “safety net” for all residents of Harris County, is the largest county health system in Texas, and the 3rd largest in the country.

“We were able to drive home improved outcomes,” Gupta says. “Right now, Harris Healt actually does better than most private groups in the country.” He adds that Harris’s diabetic exam rate is consistently near or near 80% compliance.

Growing Diabetic Population

Nationally, the diabetic population in the United States is growing. Over the last 4 years, Harris’s diabetic population has gone from 47,000 to 58,000. To maintain and improve exam access, Harris added the bidirectional integration to their already successful IRIS platform in late 2015. To measure the effectiveness of this integration, Harris Health conducted a study of its providers and patient care technicians in the programs. The analysis evaluated efficiency, engagement and patient access.

Among the findings:

  • 86% of primary care physicians (PCPs) said that the IRIS-EHR integration increased access for patients receiving diabetic retinal exams.
  • 83% of PCP respondents considered the IRIS reports to be helpful for managing diabetic patients.
  • After implementing the system, patient exam volume increased 49.4% compared to the same period in the prior year.

Gupta is happy with those numbers, but is always looking for improvement.

Grady Health System in Atlanta, Ga. got a glimpse of the success at Harris Health. Looking for similar results, Grady entered their own relationship with IRIS, Gupta explains. Grady has an estimated 45,000 diabetic patients who are not compliant with their eye exam every year. At least 12,000 of these patients will have pathology that otherwise until now has gone undiagnosed.

“We want to give access to everybody out there who needs a diabetic evaluation. I’d be the happiest guy in the world if we can get all these people and help them see,” Gupta says. As he sees healthcare, the importance is “taking care of the patient in front of me, not just patients at large.”

Ultimately “our mission,” Gupta concludes, “is to eliminate preventable blindness.”

 

For Clinton and Trump, It’s a Low-Key Skirmish Over Affordable Care Act

It’s not 2012, and Obamacare appears to no longer cause much visceral passion on both sides, or many words, from the presidential candidates. There are so many other issues, aside from healthcare, never mind questions over Donald Trump’s outrageous statements, or Hillary Clinton’s email. While healthcare was not front-and-center in their nomination acceptance speeches and statements on the economy, Clinton and Trump are very much opposed, especially when it comes to Obamacare,  also known as the Affordable Care Act.

Let’s look at Trump’s GOP-nomination acceptance speech first, because, well, it’s easier to dispatch: essentially, he didn’t have much to say about health care for the general population.

17 words.

“We will repeal and replace disastrous Obamacare. You will be able to choose your own doctor again,” he said in his acceptance speech.

Of course, he probably figured he didn’t have to do any explaining, which is not unusual for Trump. In healthcare, that’s his trump card: Trump has repeatedly called for the repeal of Obamacare.

Trump  emphasized on his Website:“On day one of the Trump Administration, we will ask Congress to immediately deliver a full repeal of Obamacare,”citing runway costs, and websites that don’t work, among other issues.

In his economic address, Trump again pounded on Obamacare, but with few words, or explanations. “One of my first acts as President will be to repeal and replace disastrous Obamacare, saving another 2 million American jobs,” Trump said. Trump’s claim about the potential savings has been disputed, as  Modern Healthcare reported.

Clinton Talks More About Health Plans, Still Light on Details

Although Clinton didn’t reveal any detailed new proposals about how should we handle healthcare, she did mention in  her  acceptance speech how she worked on healthcare issues throughout her career, and her continued support for Obamacare.  Clinton mentioned briefly her failed attempt at healthcare reform during her husband’s administration, and talked about “20 million more Americans with health insurance,” under Obamacare.

Yesterday, in Detroit, Clinton said in her economic speech she would “defend and improve the Affordable Care Act, and for me, that includes giving Americans, in every state, a choice of a public option health insurance plan that will help everybody afford coverage, it will strengthen competition  and drive down costs.” As she did in her acceptance speech, Clinton also inferred in her economic address that she would work to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.

Referring to proposed tax cuts espoused by Trump —  the “Trump Loophole” she called it, citing his business interests – Clinton said her opponent’s plans would lead to massive budgetary cuts in priorities such as healthcare.

In her acceptance speech, Clinton talked about her vow to protect a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions, and she criticized Trump when he “mocks and mimics a reporter with disabilities.” She also mentioned the need for more mental health care in this country.

Clinton offered up names of people she helped working through healthcare policy.

She met Ryan Moore when he was 7, and wearing  a full body brace and weighing about 40 pounds. “Children like Ryan kept me going when our plan for universal health care failed and kept me working with leaders of both parties to help create the Children’s Health Insurance Program” and “twenty million more Americans with health insurance,” Clinton said.

She talked about Lauren Manning, who was gravely injured in the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, and how she worked on behalf of the 9/11 families “and our first responders who got sick from their time at Ground Zero.”

Citing her history, TClinton talked about how she “sweat the details of policy,” from her work for children for the Children’s Defense Fund,  in New Bedford, Mass in 1973

Clinton’s statement about her work in Massachusetts didn’t sit well with some people in New Bedford. The town’s leaders were upset at Clinton’s “depiction of the Whaling City as a place where handicapped children were abandoned at home because the schools lacked accommodations for youngsters with special needs,” according to The Boston Herald

Trump and Clinton Clash Over Veterans

In his acceptance speech, Trump targeted his assistance for veterans. “We will take care of our great veterans like they have never been taken care of before,” Trump said. “My opponent dismissed the VA scandal as being not widespread- one more sign of how out of touch she really is.”

In his healthcare plan, Trump said he would make changes in veterans assistance that – in his oft-repeated refrain: “will make America great again. ” Trump said 300,000 veterans have died, waiting for care. Trump vowed that, if elected, he would decrease wait times, improve healthcare outcomes and “facilitate a seamless transition from service into civil life.”

While Trump criticized Clinton over veterans, she, in fact, did not mention veterans in her acceptance speech. She has said on her Web site that she would ensure veterans have opportunities and tools they need to succeed upon returning home, and build a “21st century Department of Veterans Affairs to deliver world-class care.”

Clinton said she was outraged by the recent scandals at the Veterans Administration and will demand “accountability and performance from VA leadership.” So Trump’s assertion about Clinton dismissing the VA scandal: inaccurate.

Whatever vow about healthcare for veterans Trump made got swallowed up, and rightfully so,  in the aftermath of his incredible tweeting and lashing out of the family of Capt. Humayun Khan, who died in Iraq in 2004. It followed after the slain soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, criticized Trump for his proposed ban on Muslims entering the  U.S. and called on the GOP to reject the candidate.

What’s Ahead?

As we get closer to the election, it will be interesting how detailed Clinton and Trump get in their speeches and policy statements on healthcare, or if they continue on this path of generalities.

 

100 Percent Hand-Washers at Hospitals? Not so Fast. Technology Gives The Real Score

When I worked for a healthcare business-to-business magazine a few years ago, it was the rage that hospital workers should wash their hands. Of course, they should. Hospitals were touting they even hired workers undercover to catch all the would-be non-hand washers. Lots of handwringing, I’m sure, was going on.

Despite the hoopla awhile back, healthcare hand hygiene compliance remains below 40 percent, according to the World Health Organization. Unwashed hands may have millions of bacteria on them, and can cause infections, disease, and even death. Think of this: 80 percent of hospital staff that dressed wounds infected with MRSA carried the organism on their hands for three hours.

Ugh.

At hospitals, they’ve often used the “hidden spies” approach to doing a better job of getting rid of the hidden germs. Undercover colleagues would be named as part of a team to check in whenever co-workers used the restrooms or other areas after leaving surgical or other units, and make note whether they washed their hands or not. Studies are now showing that’s not really a too effective approach, and doesn’t do a good job of finding out what’s really going on.

Riverside Medical Center in Kankakee, Ill, is among a growing list of hospitals using technology, specifically an electronic hand hygiene compliance system, in this case operated by a company named  DebMed that evaluates the true amount of hand-washing going on. And you know what? It’s a plan that’s working, the hospital says.

The process starts this way. No spies needed. Well, human anyway. A computerized chip is put into soap or sanitary dispensers that sends signals through a wireless network to a DebMed database and calculates hand-washing usage, versus opportunities in specific areas of a hospital through the day. Real-time data is then sent through dashboards at the hospital that officials can monitor. DebMed touts its system as providing accurate and unbiased hand-hygiene compliance.

While Riverside was extremely confident in its method of undercover hand-washing checks, its officials discovered after implementing the DebMed system they weren’t doing as well as they thought.

Before DebMed, hospital officials believed they were having a hand-washing compliance rate of some 90 percent or more. The DebMed system found it was more like 57 percent, which was, “frankly, a little shocking,” says  Michael D. Mutterer senior VP, CNO. Mutterer couldn’t get over it. “It was puzzling. Our organization has been very quality driven. We had a false sense that we were doing an amazing job, guys.”

As a leader, he’s thinking: what’s wrong with the data? “Truly, we’re not a 57 percent organization for anything,” he thought to himself. As a result, Mutterer says, “We all knew we had a false sense of what we were doing. We knew we had to get these numbers up, it wasn’t an option.”

Using the DebMed system, Mutterer says, vast improvements have resulted. So far, the hospital is up to 80 percent – not where they want to be, but getting there.

“We always knew what we could do; what we do here is a focus on quality and safety, and one of the first things is about hand hygiene.” The hospital launched a team-focused effort, a “positive way to implement the system, and not nurse specific or punitive in nature,” he says.

The dashboards give Mutterer reminders, including some “dings” at 3 a.m. on his computer – the compliance report, telling him how things were going.

“One of the really nice things about (the DebMed) it doesn’t go to the person level, and it’s not punitive. It’s not the same as watching your peers and have to say ‘after you left that isolation room, you didn’t wash your hands.’ ”

“It’s ingrained in our system now,” Mutterer says. The goal? 100 percent, of course.

 

Soap vs. Hand Dispensers 

Wherever you are, washing hands with plain soap and running water is one of the most important steps that consumers can take to avoid getting sick and to prevent spreading infections to others, so says the CDC. If soap and water are not available, the CDC recommends using an alcohol-based sanitizer that contains at least 60 percent alcohol.

But what kind of soap should you use? That may be the rub.

Recently, the FDA issued a proposed rule requesting “additional scientific data” to support the “safety and effectiveness of certain active ingredients used in topical consumer antiseptic rubs, including hand sanitizers.”

Based on new scientific information and reviews by medical and scientific experts from an advisory committee, the FDA wants to be sure that these antiseptic rubs really reduce bacteria on the skin.

As a result, the agency is requesting manufacturers provide data for three active ingredients — alcohol (ethanol or ethyl alcohol), isopropyl alcohol and benzalkonium chloride. Since 2009, 90 percent of all consumer antiseptic rubs use ethanol or ethyl alcohol as their active ingredient, the FDA said.

“Today, consumers are using antiseptic rubs more frequently at home, work, school and in other public settings where the risk of infection is relatively low,” said Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

“These products provide a convenient alternative when hand washing with plain soap and water is unavailable, but it’s our responsibility to determine whether these products are safe and effective so that consumers can be confident when using them for themselves and their families multiple times a day.”

“To do that, we must fill the gaps in scientific data on certain active ingredients,” Woodcock said.

The proposed rule does not require any consumer hand sanitizer products to be removed from the market at this time. Instead, it requires manufacturers who want to continue marketing these products under the OTC Drug Review to provide the FDA with additional data on the active ingredients’ safety and effectiveness, including data to evaluate absorption, according to the agency.

 

 

Millennials Muddied On Insurance Coverage – Help Mom!

While the Department of Health and Human Services has rightly bragged about the widespread increase in insurance coverage among Americans, there is a big problem in this country when it comes to insurance for the millennials, findings show from a recent research report from Transamerica Center for Health Studies (TCHS).

Yes, our future.

Millennials generally have a lack of knowledge about what’s involved in complicated insurance policies, the costs involved, never mind too many skipping health checkups altogether or not even bothering to get coverage.

Luckily, some millennials are relying on mom for advice: no surprise there, according to the new TCHS report, Millennial Survey: Young Adults’ Healthcare Reality (We’ll get to that in a bit). TCHS is a division of the Transamerica Institute, a national non-profit that’s dedicated to identifying, researching and analyzing the most relevant health care issues facing consumers and employers nationwide.

At the outset, the survey numbers don’t seem bad.  Last month, HHS released a report that said the Affordable Care Act (ACA) resulted in about 20 million people gaining health insurance coverage between the passage of the law in 2010 and early 2016 – a historic reduction in the uninsured.

“Thanks to the ACA, 20 million Americans have gained health care coverage,” said HHS Secretary Sylvia M. Burwell. “We have seen progress in the past six years that the country has sought for generations. “Americans with insurance through the Health Insurance Marketplace or through their employers have benefited from better coverage and a reduction in the growth in health care costs.”

Numbers Behind The Story

The good news is that millennials are becoming increasingly insured. Those uncovered dipped from 23 percent in a 2013 survey to 11 percent, according to the most recent TCHS report. Indeed, coverage gains for young adults began in 2010 because of the provision of the ACA that allows children to stay on their parents’ health insurance plan until they’re age 26.

The health system is counting on younger, stronger and healthier millennials to reduce costs, and, more importantly, keep themselves healthy. Yet the TCHS  report shows some troubling numbers, including:

•    Almost 50 percent of millennials admit to “minimizing healthcare costs” by skipping care.

•    More than 50 percent of millennials have been diagnosed with a chronic illness or heart condition. The most common conditions among the population are depression (17 percent), weight issues (15 percent) and anxiety disorders (14 percent).

•    About 21 percent of millennials are unable to afford their routine healthcare expenses. (Some 26 percent say they can afford it with difficulty).

• 66 percent of millennials believe that $200 plus premiums per month is unaffordable

•    A majority of uninsured are women (60 percent) and unemployed (68 percent).

The Reality

Mindy Hanson, 32, of Des Moines, Iowa, has been an example of that reality. With a husband and three small children – ages 10, 6, and 5 – she personally didn’t have insurance for more than four years, not unlike many people her age.  Her family was covered under her husband’s work policy, but it was too expensive for her. “It was very scary,” Hanson said of the time she was not covered by insurance.

“I actually broke my toe at one point, and we had a few hospital bills crop up.”  Whenever she felt sick, she went to a local community healthcare clinic and paid about $25 to $30 per visit. Hanson said she knows many people her age who don’t have insurance. “It’s cheaper to go to a walk-in clinic and pay them.”

For the health system generally, “the challenge going forward are the uninsured millennials, who are needed in the market because they are generally healthier, and use their healthcare less to offset older and less healthy consumers,” said Hector De La Torre, Executive Director of TCHS.  “The ACA has helped reduce the uninsured population among millennials,   but affordability and access remain a concern,” he said. The problem is not only the uninsured, other underlying factors, are involved, the report shows:

•    55 percent of the uninsured are “not at all or not very informed about the healthcare insurance options available to them.”

•    52 percent of the uninsured millennials have been uninsured for more than two years.

•    47 percent of the uninsured millennials don’t plan on having health insurance in 2017.

“Some changes can be made to improve insurance prospects for millennials,” De LaTorre said. That could include comparison-shopping through health plans and services for consumers in Exchanges, he said.  (About 37 percent of millennials have comparison shopped for health insurance, he adds).

“Getting them insured is going to take direct (phone or face-to-face) communication and education,” De La Torre said of millennials.  “Of those who rely on family and friends for health information, their mother (or stepmother) significantly outranks everyone else” in helping them make insurance decisions, he added. Hanson would second that.

She felt obtaining insurance information was not only confusing, but “the information was just not as available as I thought it would be,” she said. “There are some  websites I’ve gone to, there is so much information you don’t know what pertains to you and what you don’t need to know.”

And for Hanson, mom was the best go-to for insurance advice.

“I got a lot of information from my mom, she’s in the insurance industry and the one I relied on for my questions,” she said.

Hanson is now covered by her husband’s insurance.